[Apt-offline-devel] Bug#565918: apt-get update and gpg database status

[Ritesh Raj Sarraf]

On Wednesday 20 Jan 2010 12:15:03 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > I rely on the --print-uris option in apt-offline. If the user uses the
> >  --print-uris option with the update command, they get a fake impression
> >  that the APT database is not GPG clean.
> >
> > Can/Should this be changed to not touch the database when using
> >  --print-uris ? Or is there another way I should handle it ?
> 

Attached patch helps for my requirements with apt-offline. I'm sure there will 
be other places where the check for APT::Get::Simulate needs to be done.

Regards,
Ritesh
-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: support-simulate-for_apt-offline.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 594 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/apt-offline-devel/attachments/20100123/c2c40cb3/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/apt-offline-devel/attachments/20100123/c2c40cb3/attachment.pgp>