where to maintain DEP8^W autopkgtest spec now
ballombe at debian.org
Mon Oct 13 19:57:34 UTC 2014
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:20:38PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:52:14PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > It took me a bit longer than that (sorry about that), but you can now
> > find attached to this mail my first attempt at adding the autopkgtest
> > spec to the Debian Policy package.
> Friendly ping to the -policy folks. Had anyone a chance to look at my
> patch and see if I should change anything to match your expectations?
> For now the only pending change I've accumulated is the one mentioned by
> Martin, about removing the section "Implicit test control file for known
> package types". If that's the only change missing, I'll be happy to send
> you a final version of the patch. If not ... I'm all ears :-)
Lintian report some issues:
W: debian-policy: doc-base-abstract-might-contain-extra-leading-whitespace autopkgtest:5
E: debian-policy: doc-base-file-references-missing-file autopkgtest:9 /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/package-tests.txt.gz
E: debian-policy: doc-base-file-references-missing-file autopkgtest:12 /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/package-tests.html
E: debian-policy: doc-base-file-references-missing-file autopkgtest:13 /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/package-tests.html
Also, would you mind if I converted autopkgtest.md to DebianDoc-SGML ?
I am concerned to have to deal with different quoting rules in different
> Feel free also to let me know you prefer me to submit the patch in other
> ways, e.g. as a proper bug report.
Yes, it would be nice to have a proper bug number to include in the changelog.
Bill. <ballombe at debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
More information about the autopkgtest-devel