[Bash-completion-devel] Bits from the Bash-Completion Team

David Paleino d.paleino at gmail.com
Sat May 10 16:19:13 UTC 2008


On Sat, 10 May 2008 18:16:34 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:

> David Paleino wrote:
> 
> > But we should also think of writing everything from zero, i.e. removing all
> > the bash2.* things. IMHO that would make things faster (i.e. less tests to
> > do since we know we are on bash3.*, ...)
> 
> The bash2.* specific stuff should be at the top of the script, so should
> be easy to get rid of...

You're right, but I didn't mean just that. I meant "try to improve everything
using possibly new features in 3.*". :)

Sorry for the misunderstanding,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/bash-completion-devel/attachments/20080510/f900735b/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Bash-completion-devel mailing list