[Bash-completion-devel] Bits from the Bash-Completion Team
David Paleino
d.paleino at gmail.com
Sat May 10 16:19:13 UTC 2008
On Sat, 10 May 2008 18:16:34 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> David Paleino wrote:
>
> > But we should also think of writing everything from zero, i.e. removing all
> > the bash2.* things. IMHO that would make things faster (i.e. less tests to
> > do since we know we are on bash3.*, ...)
>
> The bash2.* specific stuff should be at the top of the script, so should
> be easy to get rid of...
You're right, but I didn't mean just that. I meant "try to improve everything
using possibly new features in 3.*". :)
Sorry for the misunderstanding,
David
--
. ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/bash-completion-devel/attachments/20080510/f900735b/attachment.pgp
More information about the Bash-completion-devel
mailing list