[Build-common-hackers] Bug#215933: marked as done (cdbs: Doesn't generate gconf handling postinst/postrm)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org
Fri, 06 Aug 2004 19:03:17 -0700

Your message dated Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:47:20 -0700
with message-id <20040807014720.GA3477@titanium.v3.ca>
and subject line Closing this bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2003 14:58:21 +0000
>From netsnipe@optusnet.com.au Wed Oct 15 09:58:21 2003
Return-path: <netsnipe@optusnet.com.au>
Received: from mail014.syd.optusnet.com.au [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A9n6S-0006yN-00; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:58:20 -0500
Received: from espresso (c211-30-38-48.mirnd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [] (may be forged))
	by mail014.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9FEwIx12335
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:58:18 +1000
Received: from netsnipe by espresso with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1A9n6O-0004AD-Tw
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:58:16 +1000
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:58:16 +1000
From: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: cdbs: Doesn't generate gconf handling postinst/postrm
Message-ID: <20031015145816.GA15956@espresso>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.34
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@optusnet.com.au>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 (

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.12
Severity: normal

Hey guys,

I've only just realised that cdbs only does half the job when it comes
to gconf handling.=20

netsnipe@espresso:/usr/share/cdbs/1$ rgrep -i GCONF *
class/gnome.mk:# Description: A class for GNOME packages; sets up gconf var=
iables, etc

I find it very strange cdbs doesn't tie up the other end.


case "$1" in
        if [ -e /etc/gconf/schemas/${package}.schemas ]; then
                GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=3D`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` \
                gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule \
		/etc/gconf/schemas/${package}.schemas > /dev/null


if [ "$1" =3D "purge" ]; then
        rm -rf /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/apps/${package}
        rm -rf /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/schemas/apps/${package}

See <http://www.gnome.org/projects/gconf/>

Yes I know, that asking for this is being lazy on my part =3D P, but I
wouldn't be suprised if some other GNOME maintainers apart from me will
forget this as well if they make the same assumption that CDBS will
handle everything GCONF for them.

Yours sincerely,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux espresso 2.4.22 #1 Mon Sep 1 18:31:19 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_AU.UTF-8

-- no debconf information

      Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau    Computer Sci. UNSW & Debian GNU/Linux
	 <netsnipe(+)users.sf.net\0>    <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>
 GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD:  0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD
		  "Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
     Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)



Received: (at 215933-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2004 01:47:20 +0000
>From jbailey@raspberryginger.com Fri Aug 06 18:47:20 2004
Return-path: <jbailey@raspberryginger.com>
Received: from titanium.v3.ca [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BtGIq-00018s-00; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:47:20 -0700
Received: from titanium.v3.ca (localhost [])
	by titanium.v3.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id i771lKO3003489
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <215933-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:47:20 -0700
Received: (from jbailey@localhost)
	by titanium.v3.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i771lKqe003488
	for 215933-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:47:20 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: titanium.v3.ca: jbailey set sender to jbailey@raspberryginger.com using -f
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:47:20 -0700
From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@raspberryginger.com>
To: 215933-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing this bug.
Message-ID: <20040807014720.GA3477@titanium.v3.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: 215933-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 

Michael Banck confirms that this is okay for Gnome folks now.  Closing
this bug.

I do not agree with a word you say, but I will defend to the death your
right to say it. 
 - Voltaire