[Build-common-hackers] Re: CDBS documentation

[Peter Eisentraut]

Marc Dequènes wrote:
> First, as you can see Rtp and I are upstream for the main
> documentation. You made a fork of it in 0.4.37 without even mailing
> us about it. I'm still taking care of the documentation while you are
> clearly not doing it seriously.

There were a number of bug reports and other things that I fixed plus 
the new features needed to be documented.  Anyway, if documentation is 
to be done "seriously", it needs to be done in conjunction with the 
product it's documenting, not on some remote site.  I thunk that when 
you included your documentation into the CDBS package, that was the 
idea.  I'm sorry to hear that you have other plans.