[Build-common-hackers] Bug#448141: Maybe wrong order of debhelper commands in binary: rule?

Fabian Greffrath fabian.greffrath at web.de
Fri Oct 26 14:11:18 UTC 2007

I can provide further information: Funnily, if I add the line
'DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS += -V' to debian/rules, the 'faac' package has a
versioned dependency on the 'libfaac0' package. But this is not the way
I want to implement this, i.e. I do not want to implement the versioned
library dependency in debian/rules at all but preferable via a
libfaac0.shlibs file.

Maybe the order of the debhelper commands that are called in the
'binary:' rule have an effect. But as far as I can see they seem to be
(nearly) the same order as in the debhelper debian/rules template.

However, I believe that package dependencies should (must?) *not* depend
on the order of the packages in debian/control. And this is what happens


More information about the Build-common-hackers mailing list