[Build-common-hackers] Bug#508162: Bug#508162: Please document the "correct" order of rules and classes in debian/rules

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Mon Dec 8 14:37:35 UTC 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 03:10:58PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>I'd like to know if there is a consensus (i.e. a rule-of-thumb) 
>concerning the order in which the CDBS class and rules files have to 
>be included in debian/rules? -- I am thinking about a statement like 
>"include rules first, then classes"?

In principle the order does not matter.

But in reality, as you've experienced, it does.

Please file individual bugreports for each such issue that you discover.


At best such issues should be corrected to not exist, but if too 
impractical at least it should detect and emit a warning when loaded in 
a suboptimal order.


   - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

   [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkk9MS8ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiUVgCcD5kYWW1ObbYCfmTCRnV3x0Cb
EMMAn2s4ggEpTHx+7g9zCwwfu+rUI3a/
=ruqF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Build-common-hackers mailing list