[Build-common-hackers] Standardisation of the name of the patching targets included in debian/rules.

Stefano Zacchiroli zack at debian.org
Sun Feb 3 19:14:35 UTC 2008

On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:10:41AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> I find personnaly patch/unpatch more easy to understand, but YMMV...

I think (hope) that no one will be able to find a reason why the two
target should *not* be called "patch" / "unpatch". They are IMO the only
2 that people will be able to guess out of the blue.

So please go for patch/unpatch.

Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20080203/bcb91a9f/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Build-common-hackers mailing list