[Build-common-hackers] Bug#537240: Bug#537240: Bug#537240: Bug#537240: cdbs: should create versioned debhelper dependency

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Mon Aug 3 19:27:52 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 03:40:53PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>packages built with cdbs currently trigger a lintian 
>package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper, but the cdbs 
>maintainer thinks that cdbs' behavior is correct.
>
>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:22:08PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:53:24PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:13:48PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> >> >cdbs creates an unversioned debhelper dependency, which triggers 
>> >> >a lintian warning on the generated package.
>> >>
>> >> Could you please quote that lintian warning?
>> >
>> I disagree with the described "recommended practice".  That could 
>> apply to *any* package, not just debhelper.  Backports older than 
>> oldstable will always be risky business!
>
>May I suggest that the maintainers of two important packaging tools
>get their opinions sorted out in a way that a package prepared using
>one tool do not get flagged as faulty by the other? Thanks ;)

Thanks for the suggestion, but...

As I wrote above, I do not see this issue as tied to debhelper: If 
lintian warned about unversioned dependency on perl[1] then I would 
similarly disagree.


Kind regards,

  - Jonas

[1] Next release of CDBS will generate unversioned dependency on perl 
when using perlmodule.mk ;-)

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=qOot
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Build-common-hackers mailing list