[Build-common-hackers] Bug#537240: Bug#537240: Bug#537240: cdbs: should create versioned debhelper dependency

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Thu Jul 16 12:22:08 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:53:24PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:13:48PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> >cdbs creates an unversioned debhelper dependency, which triggers a
>> >lintian warning on the generated package.
>>
>> Could you please quote that lintian warning?
>
>$ lintian --info *.changes
>W: ser2net source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 5
>N:
>N:    The package doesn't declare a versioned build dependency on debhelper.
>N:    Recommended practice is to always declare an explicit versioned
>N:    dependency on debhelper equal to or greater than the compatibility level
>N:    used by the package, even if the versioned dependency isn't strictly
>N:    necessary. Having a versioned dependency also helps with backports to
>N:    older releases and correct builds on partially updated systems.
>N:
>N:    Refer to the debhelper(7) manual page for details.
>N:
>N:    Severity: minor, Certainty: certain
>N:

Thanks.

I disagree with the described "recommended practice".  That could apply 
to *any* package, not just debhelper.  Backports older than oldstable 
will always be risky business!


  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=Nv4r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Build-common-hackers mailing list