[Build-common-hackers] problems with multi-binary package

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On 11-08-17 at 09:12pm, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2011-08-17 21:11, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> > now the only thing i could imagine causing problems, is that 
> > libfoo-doc is of "Architecture:all".
> 
> doh, that was stupid:
> 
> >  Package: assimp-utils
> > -Architecture: any
> > +Architecture: all
> >  Section: utils
> 
> foo-utils is obviously not Architecture:all, as it is binary and 
> depends on libfoo2
> 
> sorry for the noise

No problem.  I came to same conclusion as you :-)

NB! Your package lack build-dependency on som Boost libs.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20110817/1dcdda1e/attachment.pgp>