[Build-common-hackers] Bug#574791: Bug#574791: just my 0.1 cents

[Yaroslav Halchenko]

eh heh -- since requested the dirty and ugly one, here is the starting
point (patch on top of "compiled" .mk files, not .mk.in... sorry -- not
that advanced yet ;) )

it does
1. check if python-(all-)dbg in build-depends
   (please please make it proper -- now it is ugly pipe)
2. if it is defined -- it adds into the loop installation using
   corresponding python%-dbg compiler thus building necessary _d.so

TODO: Check if python-MODULE-dbg is defined, complain otherwise and move
those _d.so into that package instead (could probably be achieved via
customization of --install-platlib option for that call of
setup.py)

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

> On 11-10-13 at 09:41am, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > indeed having this functionality would be really nice ;)

> Thanks for the encouragement.

> Contributions - even crude messy code or even pseudo-code - is even more 
> appreciated!


> Regards,

>  - Jonas
-- 
=------------------------------------------------------------------=
Keep in touch                                     www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko                 www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-NF-very-cruel-hack-to-start-automagic-building-of-ex.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2336 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20111013/0f962194/attachment-0001.patch>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/attachments/20111013/0f962194/attachment-0001.pgp>