Bug#367885: [Buildd-tools-devel] Bug#367885: schroot: schroot: FTBFS for sarge-backports, all archs

[Roger Leigh]

René van Bevern <rvb at debian.org> writes:

> schroot 0.2.9-0bpo1 fails to build from source on all Backports.org
> architectures (http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=schroot)

Checking correctness of source dependencies...
After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied:
pkg-config(inst 0.17.2-1 ! >= wanted 0.20) libpam0g-dev(inst 0.76-22 ! >= wanted 0.79-2bpo1) liblockdev1-dev(inst 1.0.1-6 ! >= wanted 1.0.2-0bpo1)
Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping schroot

> The reason is a too strict build dependency. Backports.org archives
> are lower pinned than the official Sarge archives in the autobuilder
> chroots. Because of this, liblockdev1 1.0.1-6 is to be installed
> instead of 1.0.2-0bpo1.
>
> Using a relation like ">=" instead of "=" should make the buildd
> install the correct version of the package. It's basically the same
> problem as handling Build-Depends: for uploads to experimental.

The current build deps for sarge-backports are:

Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config (>= 0.20), libpam0g-dev (>= 0.79-2bpo1), uuid-dev, liblockdev1-dev (>= 1.0.2-0bpo1), libboost-dev, libboost-program-options-dev, gettext, libcppunit-dev

I'm using ">=", rather than "=", as you suggest above.  How exactly
should I be writing this?


Thanks,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux        http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20060518/af65ae0e/attachment.pgp