[Buildd-tools-devel] Bug#425855: Bug#425855: Bug#425855: sbuild: linux-kernel-headers deprecated

Roger Leigh rleigh at whinlatter.ukfsn.org
Fri May 25 19:57:35 UTC 2007


Clint Adams <schizo at debian.org> writes:

>> OK.  Will "linux-libc-dev" be sufficient, or would a regex be better?
>> i.e. will this contain a version number or some other variation
>> (perhaps for non-Linux ports) in the name either now or at some point
>> in the future?
>
> Previous state (since the inception of linux-kernel-headers up to what
> will be the case for lenny):
>
> release arches= linux-kernel-headers
> hurd= gnumach-dev, hurd-dev
> kfreebsd= kfreebsd-kernel-headers
>
> Future state:
>
> release arches= linux-libc-dev
> hurd= gnumach-dev, hurd-dev
> kfreebsd= kfreebsd-kernel-headers

Does this look OK?  It covers all the bases, but we might need to be a
bit more intelligent about which gets used when.  This should ideally
be expressed in the same manner as a Depends line in the control file,
so we can have arch-specific and alternative packages.

[Sbuild/Conf.pm]
our @toolchain_regex = ( 'binutils$', 'gcc-[\d.]+$', 'g\+\+-[\d.]+$',
'libstdc\+\+', 'libc[\d.]+-dev$', 'linux-kernel-headers$',
'linux-libc-dev$', 'gnumach-dev$', 'hurd-dev$',
'kfreebsd-kernel-headers$');


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20070525/8695f15f/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Buildd-tools-devel mailing list