[Buildd-tools-devel] Bug#500871: schroot: Revisiting bug#427047: followup implementation question

[Peter Rabbitson]

Package: schroot
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: minor


Hi!

I finally came back to using schroot, and was delighted to find the
feature I proposed some time ago fully implemented. I have a
documentation/example question though. Everywhere in the documentation
and in the default fstab file you assert that "The format of this file
is the same as  for  /etc/fstab,  documented in fstab(5)". However in my
initial proposal I dropped the 5th and 6th field, namely fs_freq and
fs_passno. Is there a reason to maintain those without mentioning that
their values are ignored? Or are the values in fact interpreted in some way?

Thank you

Peter