[buildd-tools-devel] Bug#559655: Bug#559655: the upgrade misses an explicit version
Roger Leigh
rleigh at codelibre.net
Tue Jan 5 23:40:41 UTC 2010
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:29:10AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a second thought, my patch probably won't solve the problem of
> experimental (or other NotAutomatic) dependencies: in the best case it
> fixes NotAutomatic upgrades only. I'll look in the dependency problem
> if this track is deemed reasonable.
Thanks! I'll look over your patch over the weekend. You might want to
also check out the dependency resolver changes on the buildd branch,
since I will be reviewing and applying these first. As a result, your
patch will be easier to merge if it applies on top of these changes.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20100105/079dfa07/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Buildd-tools-devel
mailing list