[buildd-tools-devel] Bug#559655: Bug#559655: the upgrade misses an explicit version

Roger Leigh rleigh at codelibre.net
Tue Jan 5 23:40:41 UTC 2010


On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:29:10AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> After a second thought, my patch probably won't solve the problem of
> experimental (or other NotAutomatic) dependencies: in the best case it
> fixes NotAutomatic upgrades only.  I'll look in the dependency problem
> if this track is deemed reasonable.


Thanks!  I'll look over your patch over the weekend.  You might want to
also check out the dependency resolver changes on the buildd branch,
since I will be reviewing and applying these first.  As a result, your
patch will be easier to merge if it applies on top of these changes.


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/buildd-tools-devel/attachments/20100105/079dfa07/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Buildd-tools-devel mailing list