[cut-team] Rethinking CUT

[Joey Hess]

Michael Gilbert wrote:
> So, your manifesto identifies these items as the root causes

Not as I understand the term "root causes". Those are implementation
details.

> The existing testing suite already provides a set of constantly
> evolving software releases, how does CUT address this need any
> better?

Not in a form that is constantly usable.

> Since this is new jargon to me, I looked it up in the jargon file [0].
> Since I'm saying that the name should be changed "by fiat" by those in
> authority, I don't see how this fits at all.  There is no other problem
> to fix after the name changes, so there is no recursive nature.  If
> anything, this would be the last step in a yak shaving, not the first.

My estimate for the amount of work required to change the name of
testing, all references to it, etc, is 2 years to infinite. What's yours? :P

-- 
see shy jo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/cut-team/attachments/20100910/d264b707/attachment.pgp>