[cut-team] On getting cut/rolling officially supported...

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:49:40AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I think that the plan should be:

ACK.

The important feedback from Roland IMHO is that maintainer should not
feel they have to do more work in response to the introduction of
rolling. The suggestion to advertise that as an experiment seems the
right one to me and should be enough to dispel this worries.

All in all, the current context seems to be very similar on paper to the
one of introducing testing ages ago: for the moment we surely don't aim
at having CUT "more supported" than testing. I do wonder then, and ask
to those with better memory than mine, did this problem show up when
testing was introduced?

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, |  .  |. I've fans everywhere
ti resta John Fante -- V. Caposella .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/cut-team/attachments/20100928/6287c18f/attachment.pgp>