[Dbconfig-common-changes] dbconfig-common/doc Makefile, 1.1,
1.2 dbapp-policy.html, 1.8, NONE dbapp-policy.sgml, NONE, 1.1
seanius at haydn.debian.org
seanius at haydn.debian.org
Tue Nov 15 17:49:35 CET 2005
Update of /cvsroot/dbconfig-common/dbconfig-common/doc
In directory haydn:/org/alioth.debian.org/chroot/home/users/seanius/tmp/cvs-serv31926/doc
Modified Files:
Makefile
Added Files:
dbapp-policy.sgml
Removed Files:
dbapp-policy.html
Log Message:
moved dbapp-policy to debiandoc as well
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/dbconfig-common/dbconfig-common/doc/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -d -r1.1 -r1.2
--- Makefile 15 Nov 2005 15:53:29 -0000 1.1
+++ Makefile 15 Nov 2005 16:49:29 -0000 1.2
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# example Makefile for viewing/editing an encrypted file
-TARGETS := dbconfig-common
+TARGETS := dbconfig-common dbapp-policy
#EXTENSIONS := xml dvi html info ps pdf txt tov tex
EXTENSIONS := html ps pdf txt
--- dbapp-policy.html DELETED ---
--- NEW FILE: dbapp-policy.sgml ---
<!doctype debiandoc public "-//DebianDoc//DTD DebianDoc//EN">
<book>
<title>
Best practices for packaging database applications
</title>
<author>
Sean Finney
<version>
$Revision: 1.1 $
<abstract>
This draft describes a set of guidelines and best practices to be
implemented by the maintainers of database application packages.
Pending a final draft, desire, and acceptance by the developer
community at large, this may serve as the foundation for an
official policy--or it may simply remain as it is.
<copyright>
Copyright © 2005 sean finney <email>seanius at debian.org</email>
<p>
This document is licensed under the
<url id="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/afl-2.1.php" name="Academic Free License, Version 2.1">
<toc sect>
<chapt id="dbapps">Database Applications
<sect id="scope">Scope
<p>
In this document a "database application" is any program that
relies on some form of data storage outside the scope of the
program's execution. This is primarily intended to encompass
applications which rely on a relational database server or their
own persistent storage mechanism, though effectively is a much
larger set of applications. In the future this scope may have to
be narrowed to avoid ambiguity and be more effective as a policy.
<sect id="terminology">Terminology
<p>
For the purposes of this document, there are two types of
databases: <em>persistent</em> and <em>cached</em>.
<p>
<em>Persistant</em> databases contain data that can not be
entirely reconstituted in the case that the database is removed.
Also included are databases that if removed would cause serious
denial of service (making a system unstable/unusable) or security
concerns. Applications using this category of databases are
the primary focus of this document. Examples:
<list>
<item>relational database servers providing storage to
other applications.
<item>web applications using a relational database
<item>openldap's slapd databases
<item>rrd files containing accumulated/historical data.
</list>
<p>
<em>Cached</em> databases are a specific group of databases which upon their
removal could be sufficiently regenerated, and could be removed without
causing serious denial of service or security concerns. Examples include:
<list>
<item>debconf responses
<item>locate database
<item>caching nameserver data
<item>apt's list of available packages
</list>
<sect id="placement">Placement of databases
<p>
Both persistent and cached databases fall under already
defined guidelines in the FHS; persistant data must be placed
under <file>/var/lib/packagename</file>, and cached data under
<file>/var/cache/packagename</file>, respectively <footnote>or
an equivalently compliant location</footnote>. The remainder
of this document primarily addresses the former.
<sect id="installationissues">Installation related issues
<p>
The following descriptions are divided into different parts,
based on the action being performed. For each process, the
acceptable behavior of database application packages is outlined.
<sect1 id="preconfiguration">Automatic Database Configuration/Prompting
<p>
It must always be assumed that the local admin knows
more than any automated system. He/She must be given
the ability to opt out of any "assistance" on the part
of the package maintainer. Packages providing any such
automated assistance may do so by default if and only if
the opt-out debconf prompt is equal to or greater than
priority high. With this in mind, directions for manually
installing (and upgrading if relevant) the database must
be included in the documentation for the package.
<sect1 id="installation">Database Installation
<p>
For packages providing automated assistance, database
installation/configuration should be considered as part of
the package installation process. A failure to install
a database should be considered a failure to install the
package and should result in an error value returned by
the relevant maintainer script. Packages may provide a
"try again" option to re-attempt configuration. Any such
"try again" features here or elsewhere mentioned in this
document must have a default negative response value,
otherwise infinite loops could occur for noninteractive
installs.
<p>
To properly handle package reinstallation and
reconfiguration, any automated assistance must allow for
a package to be reinstalled at the same version without
removing or overwriting existing application data.
Package reconfiguration may do so.
<sect1 id="upgrading">Database Upgrading
<p>
Occasionally a new upstream version of an application
will require modifications to be made to the application's
underlying database. If an automated system is to assist
in such an upgrade, it should be considered as a part
of the package upgrade process; failure to upgrade the
database should be considered a failure to upgrade the
package. This is the only way to safely guarantee the
chance to reattempt the upgrade with respect to the
underlying database.
<p>
Furthermore, any automated system that makes modifications
to a database during upgrade must provide the ability
to back-up the database before proceeding. Packages may
perform such backups automatically, or prompt the admin
via debconf. Failure to back up the database should also
be considered a failure in the upgrade process of the
whole package. As in the case of installation, automated
assistance may provide a "try-again" feature to re-attempt
the upgrade, but ultimately in the case of failure should
cause a non-zero exit value to be returned to dpkg.
<p>
<em>Note</em>: if the database in question supports
transactional operations, it is recommended to do so.
<sect1 id="removing">Database Removal
<p>
A package should consider databases in a spirit similar
to configuration files or log files; they are something
to which the administrator may have some need even when
the software that created it is no longer present.
<p>
Packages may provide support for removing underlying
databases, but it is highly recommended that the
administrator is prompted with a chance to preserve
the data before doing so.
<sect id="tools">Build-time and run-time tools
<p>
while not essential, a set of common tools for packaging and
configuring these applications can make the life of the maintainer
as well as the adminsitrator much easier.
<sect1 id="dbc"><package>dbconfig-common</package>
<p>
<package>dbconfig-common</package> is a common framework
for packaging database applications. more information
can be found at the
<url id="http://people.debian.org/~seanius/policy/dbconfig-common.html" name="dbconfig-common homepage">, or in various formats under
<file>/usr/share/doc/dbconfig-common</file>.
<sect id="related">Related threads/discussions
<p>
<list>
<item><url id="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/10/msg00340.html" name="RFC: best practice creating database">
<item><url id="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/10/msg00962.html" name="RFC: common database policy/infrastracture">
</list>
</book>
More information about the Dbconfig-common-changes
mailing list