[Debburn-devel] Suggestions
Christian Fromme
kaner at strace.org
Wed Sep 6 17:10:53 UTC 2006
Hello List,
As some of you already suggested, soon after the release of -pre4, a
-devel-branch should be made for general hacking and breaking. :-)
Here is a small pool of ideas we should consider for the TODO-list after
the branch:
- Change old-style function definitions to ANSI-style function
definitions
- Remove unnecessary Makros (like EXPORT in cdrecord.c and others)
and/or replace them if needed with better ones
- Code formatting: For my eyes, some parts of the code are hardly
readable because of the formatting style JS used [example:
'for(acpos=0;acpos<argc;acpos++)' from cdrecord.c]
- Maybe a sort of a styleguide would help for orientation how the
code should be formattted in the future (we already had a small
discussion about this on the list[0]) -- not to religiously enforce
stupid rules, but for orientation. I would happily volunteer to
write such a coding-style file if we want it.
- Replace libschily as far as possible with standard-lib functions.
Best case would be to remove it completly.
- Split up the tarball into several smaller one. This seems quite
invasive, but makes a lot of sense and has already been suggested by
many others
- Rename cdrecord/ to wodim/ and cdrecord/cdrecord.{h,c} to
wodim/wodim.{h,c}
- ...
This is just a small list of items I can think of right now, comments,
flames and other ideas welcome!
Best wishes,
Christian
[0]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debburn-devel/2006-September/000021.html
More information about the Debburn-devel
mailing list