[debhelper-devel] Bug#415396: Bug#415396: "dh_install --list-missing" should ignore manpages and other installed files
niels at thykier.net
Mon Apr 3 11:07:00 UTC 2017
> Michael Stapelberg:
>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Niels Thykier <niels at thykier.net> wrote:
>> Great. Find attached an updated patch including documentation.
> Thanks. I am a bit busy this week, so odds are I will not have time to
> look at it until the weekend at the earliest. Please ping me if you
> have not heard from me on this by Tuesday.
Created a branch for it:
Review welcome. Note that the "installed-by" files work differently
than documented. I have opted for keeping the behaviour and correcting
> If you got time to spare and want to keep things moving, I got some
> things I am considering to change:
> * Make log_installed_files use "basename($0)" rather than taking an
> argument for the "helper name". The actual file name is an
> implementation-detail anyway, and tool writers do not benefit from
> the addition complexity
> * Make log_installed_files support being called multiple times from
> the same helper to make it easier for tool writers. Most of them
> probably don't need to accumulate their set of installed/processed
> files. dh_install basically only does it because it was implementing
> the "missing" feature AFAICT.
Done. This will probably come in handby due to the next item and the
following call pattern.
dh_install -ppkg foo bar
> If you want to start on dh_installman (or other tools):
> * CAVEAT: The tools have to start acting on *all* packages but
> "do nothing" for "uninteresting packages" like dh_install does.
> Otherwise, the user will see "missing" entries when doing an
> dpkg-buildpackage -B build (or -A).
Did a prototype for dh_installman, which seems to be working (with the
NB: Due to how this is implemented, the "install-by" files will get
duplicates when you do:
dh_install -a # first copy
dh_install -i # second copy
It does not appear to be a problem atm., so I have left it at that.
> The debhelper API here is probably horribly lacking IRT making this
> easy. So far, it has only been done in dh_install, but it is a
> necessity for this feature to work correctly (Especially with
> --fail-missing). Bonus points for improving that. :)
>> Is there any large-scale testing that debhelper has, to confirm that my
>> change doesn’t break things so far?
> No. But I suppose we could do an upload to experimental and ask if
> Lucas have time to do a mass-rebuild.
I might do the upload "soon" (before the release), but lets keep the
mass-rebuild for post-freeze to avoid diverting peoples attention.
More information about the debhelper-devel