[debhelper-devel] Bug#832564: debhelper: udeb packages should not be processed with noudeb

[Javier Serrano Polo]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:38:05 +0200 Helmut Grohne <helmut at subdivi.de> wrote:
> Just
> adding those headers is more explicit and much harder to get wrong.

It is more explicit and redundant. If you do not add those headers, you
do not get wrong at all.

> It simply isn't worth the maintenance cost.

You described development cost, not maintenance one.

Adding Build-Profiles fields is not an option because maintainers are
reluctant to support build profiles; e.g.,
https://bugs.debian.org/890834 .

I know it is not worth your effort since you do not use noudeb and
similar build profiles; it is worth mine. It is far easier for me to
maintain this code than to add Build-Profiles fields to all packages.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3386 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debhelper-devel/attachments/20180303/a5269a58/attachment-0003.bin>