[debhelper-devel] Bug#747141: Bug#748304: tupi: not binNMU safe

Sebastian Ramacher sramacher at debian.org
Sat May 17 08:45:54 UTC 2014


On 2014-05-17 11:05:48, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2014 15:52:04 Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > The problem is that tupi-data (= ${binary:Version})
> > appears in tupi's ${misc:Depends}.
> 
> Thank you for excellent diagnosis. I believe this problem inherited from 
> debhelper's #747141... Let's see what debhelper maintainers will say about 
> this...

No, I think this is not a bug in debhelper but a bug in tupi. With the
current use of dh_installdocs --link-doc you loose the binNMU changelog
entry. I'd rather have dh_installdocs error out if it's used that way on
a combination of arch-indepdent and arch-dependent packages.

I've filed #748376 against lintian to emit a warning if it
dh_installdocs is used in that way.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debhelper-devel/attachments/20140517/45804523/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the debhelper-devel mailing list