[Debian-hebrew-package] Bug#486095: marked as done (Can libhdate use gpc instead of fpc?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:18:29 +0000
with message-id <E1KbAyz-0000Nr-4l at ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#486095: fixed in libhdate 1.4.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #486095,
regarding Can libhdate use gpc instead of fpc?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
486095: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=486095
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy at yahoo.it>
Subject: Can libhdate use gpc instead of fpc?
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:55:44 +0100
Size: 2599
Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-hebrew-package/attachments/20080904/b039a6ab/attachment.eml 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Lior Kaplan <kaplan at debian.org>
Subject: Bug#486095: fixed in libhdate 1.4.12-1
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:18:29 +0000
Size: 6088
Url: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-hebrew-package/attachments/20080904/b039a6ab/attachment-0001.eml