[Debian-hebrew-package] FW: Re: [Question #138827]: why not upgrading hocr to 0.10.17

[kobi zamir]

Hello,

i do not contribute to hocr-gtk anymore due to lack of time :-( , qhocr is
my preferred gui now.
hocr 0.12 ( when it will be done ) will not have a gui in the code tree.
i am not happy with 0.10 speed and memory usage. i do not want to push it
into debian/ubuntu.
the memory and computation intensive parts of 0.10 are not optional, i hope
to fix that in 0.12.

kobi

p.s.
anyone interested in taking http://sane-pygtk.sourceforge.net/ and continue
it's development ?

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Enrico Segre
<enrico.segre at weizmann.ac.il>wrote:

> wait - what about hocr-gtk, which I built from very the same sources? (but
> see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hocr/+bug/596820)
> Besides qhocr?
> Enrico
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From Lior Kaplan <kaplan at debian.org>
> Sent Fri 12/24/2010 1:02 AM
> To enrico.segre at weizmann.ac.il
> Cc debian-hebrew-package at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Subject Re: [Debian-hebrew-package] FW: Re: [Question #138827]: why not
> upgrading hocr to 0.10.17
>
> The reason we didn't upgrade our hocr is that the new version doesn't
> contain the GUI parts,
> we're trying to have another GUI in before removing the current one.
>
> Kobi, the hocr developer is part of this group.
>
> Kaplan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-hebrew-package mailing list
> Debian-hebrew-package at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-hebrew-package
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-hebrew-package/attachments/20101224/a5393782/attachment.htm>