[Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#485233: Path still broken in 23-2

[Holger Levsen]

Hi Jonas et all,

On Wednesday 03 December 2008 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> NB! Please cc me currently - I am subscribed to the list, but either it
> is slow to deliver currently or something else is wrong.

Ok.

Just a quick reply as I'm in the middle of two irc meetings.. I'll might send 
a longer one later...

> I agree that we should only release packages working with 0.82 release
> of Sucrose.

Yay :)

Actually: yay yay yay! 

Jonas, you've seen my mails to d-release@ about sugar 0.82 in lenny? 

> I do not agree that we should avoid activity releases newer than
> upstream releases, as long as they work properly with 0.82.
>
> What made you resolve Calculate 0.25 as belonging to Sugar 0.83?

<h01ger> [12:18:57] does http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Source_Code 
show the latest version for 0.82 while for example 
http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/sources/Calculate/ also has 24+25.tgz, which 
are for 0.83? (and 23 is the latest for 0.82?)
<morgs> [12:19:36] h01ger: yes, those are the 0.82 versions


> No, I have not yet released 0.25-1, as it turns out there are more
> problems. I suspect your 0.23-2 release also is broken[1]!

why do you suspect that? the changelog and more importantly the debdiff to 
0.23-1 looked good.

> I really would appreciate if you'd warn here on the list _before_
> releasing. 

Ack. With how much time in advance? Is a commit to git master enough warning? 
(Seriously :)

> Now you force me to reprioritize my evening :-/ 

No. a.) you're a volunteer, end of the story. b.) it's called unstable for a 
reason. c.) i'd be happy to take over, but I'm refraining now as I assume you 
are on it. (unless I here otherwise of course.)

there are more packages broken, how do we proceed with them? (btw, 0.23-1 also 
FTBFS is current sid for me, so I plan on rebuilding them all (*), to see if 
they can still build.)

(*) those 14 packages in collab-maint, are there any others (packaged).


regards,	
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20081203/14e9ef02/attachment.pgp