[Debian-olpc-devel] How _should_ we import new changes into git?

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Fri Jan 16 18:20:01 UTC 2009

Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:17:55AM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:21:29PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> - afaik sugar, sugar-base and sugar-hulahop should really migrate to 
>> lenny, while for the rest its not critical, right?
> sugar-datastore got an important bugfix and sugar-toolkit fixes a 
> security issue if I've understood that correctly. So they should 
> migrate as well, which leaves only sugar-web-activity as non-critical 
> (copyright fixes, translation updates).


> With the latest versions (i.e. from unstable), Sugar seems to work 
> fine now on my system (only some tracebacks that don't look critical). 

That is _great_ feedback.  Your bugreports are good, but hinting about 
positive experiences like this is important too.  Thanks!

> So I'd say "migrate latest versions to lenny" instead of "remove from 
> lenny".

Anyone from the OLPC team is free to get in touch with the release team 
and request unblocking of Sugar-related packages. No need for that to be 
me, really.

...and as anyone is welcome to join the OLPC team, really there's no 
excuse ;-)

  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)


More information about the Debian-olpc-devel mailing list