[Debian-olpc-devel] Sugar vs. python-xpcom

Luke Faraone luke at faraone.cc
Mon Aug 16 17:34:36 UTC 2010

On 08/16/2010 04:29 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been working on getting python-xpcom built from the pyxpcom
> separate codebase on hg.mozilla.org. I just made sure to downgrade the
> code to what it was for 1.9.1, and the result seems to be working.
> Could you please check that the new packages work properly with
> sugar/python-hulahop?

I did a quick test of Browse.activity using your pyxpcom package, and
Browse (which uses hulahop) didn't have any problems with it. Let me
know if you need help getting that sponsored into Debian experimental.

│Luke Faraone                          ╭Debian / Ubuntu Developer╮│
│http://luke.faraone.cc                ╰Sugar Labs, Systems Admin╯│
│PGP: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B  DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506          │

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20100816/3eaa0274/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the Debian-olpc-devel mailing list