[Debian-olpc-devel] lintian warning: sugar-irc-activity

Ankur Khurana ankur at seeta.in
Wed Jul 28 15:06:19 UTC 2010


sorry, dont know what went wrong, it wasn't sent complete.

PS:- i will make sure that in future , if i edit any wiki entry , i will add
commit message in future and i am sorry for the any inconvenience
caused.Please also tell me if i am overposting on the list .
Regards,
Ankur.

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Ankur Khurana <ankur at seeta.in> wrote:

> hi,
>
> well i in earlier mail what i tried asking was that what i did was
> permissible or not , in  the sense that there are some rules to be followed
> while testing and tweaking the package and in case i was violating any.This
> was more about asking permission rather asking if it will work or not.
>
> PS:- i will make sure that in future , if i edit any wiki entry , i will
> add commit message in future and i am sorry for the any
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas at jones.dk> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:50:34AM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
>>
>>  On 07/27/2010 07:53 PM, James Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, that would do it.  Large hammer for small nail.  However you could
>>>> also restrict your chmod to only the affected files, and do it to the files
>>>> prior to install.  Remind me where your debian/rules file is stored (git
>>>> somewhere, if I recall correctly), and I can have a look.
>>>>
>>> Git repo: git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/sugar-irc-activity.git
>>>
>>> debian/rules viewable on the web:
>>> http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-irc-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules
>>>
>>>  I'm unsure of your meaning.  I don't know if these files need to be +x,
>>>> but my meagre research suggests not.  You should do functional test on the
>>>> package to make sure you can connect to an IRC server and have a
>>>> conversation.
>>>>
>>>
>>> - From what I can tell, they don't.
>>>
>>
>> James' point, as I read it, is that when Ankur does the packaging, then
>> Ankur should verify that the packaging is sane - and an obvious test is to
>> try use the package :-)
>>
>> It is good that you can support the assumed sanity of the packaging.  The
>> point of actual testing still stand.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>  - Jonas
>>
>> --
>>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>>
>>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJMUDoEAAoJECx8MUbBoAEhwGMP/1DYUEI3thp6yf7AwzXTTNfL
>> WgmQQMoM/cg3VCB6dAR9BET0mRShx8O0r2L6ByPzSfFSei1CloKROOJ4P9/Mjz9y
>> N2CPmQtkhuL913r+WcIX2k4qA+YHQNdL26EVYGvKEWsyoH3TQCkyErXB2NiHlfzI
>> d7n+geQTiEIO6TFhcNPHWNJRcpZlT5UPfLM3pByucBIOyd66Lf1z/TjWnNDxKxza
>> u798Lm/eg6LNdRscFCEE7raYbowP2qUSfkp8EWJKRrE84JeMqI358ybXUrCAWEqs
>> nUsFPpH4cQkO3sUpXE26yF0DY5G12uFjMtS1ILtnvoDykzR+7IswYzdM9gRdiju8
>> SdVK5qelNTMCgkL4uMPSnQaz31Jl5Dtl/xGzbSWyNmQ2GqcQFUeh4fzbiNlq4jUw
>> zZRTEghTfEP/9P30Cfrel+kuOzYaRV2QhD+YoM8YduXOi+qNailUFG1ilaSbyCsq
>> SzkxhOXYZY43IY1NJc63n0Q58kZ0AXb1nGIjm776IwxuMEzALT6h+H2Csl0Xbb+S
>> kwoLu8hlg7fUouVX7EP1fywH/T6OzdVU519OotkRYMaRa/IrPLMp4HmOuvQ5DLhk
>> MZPlMVZixl3GeO+H4kR67K6LFcGKByqmy0/SM2n/orcdH6otJYsZqpl3BAqxWbNN
>> 79yRJhNGlg9LcGxVh83P
>> =ArhS
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debian-olpc-devel mailing list
>> Debian-olpc-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-olpc-devel
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20100728/23da3fca/attachment.htm>


More information about the Debian-olpc-devel mailing list