[Debian-olpc-devel] Sugar 0.90

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:54:10AM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
>On 07/28/2010 11:43 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:20:14AM -0400, David Farning wrote:
>>> +1. We are currently testing that particular versions of activities 
>>> work with different versions of Sugar.  Once we have proven that we 
>>> can provide a high quality sugar on .deb user experience we will 
>>> start working with upstream on the importance of api stability and 
>>> predictable api changes.
>>
>> This is news to me.
>>
>> Would be cool if .deb packaging efforts are discussed on this 
>> mailinglist.
>
>I sent a mail[1] saying (what I thought was) pretty much the same thing 
>(with regards to testing) as above two weeks ago. Please let me know if 
>I wasn't effectively conveying my meaning.

It is not news to me that you guys are packaging Sugar activities, nor 
that you test them aginst multiple branches (I dare say that such tests 
should be expected of any official Debian packaging of Sugar 
activities).

What was news to me - and that I still do not find in your [1] even now 
reading it again, is that what David indicates as a larger coordinated 
plan related to that.


I do not feel that ideas needapproval or consensus, just that sharing 
ideas and activities early could be an improvement to our communication.


Regards,

  - Jonas

-- 
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20100728/3203dc27/attachment.pgp>