[Debian-olpc-devel] Sugar 0.90

Jonas Smedegaard jonas at jones.dk
Wed Jul 28 18:00:07 UTC 2010

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:35:46AM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
>On 07/28/2010 11:07 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I believe the following activities are written branch-agnostic:
>> Pippy
>> Etoys
>> Memory
>according to the Sugar/tasks[1] wiki page, the following activities 
>have been found to work with all branches up to 0.88(0.90 has not been 
>tested yet):
>... in addition to those mentioned above.


As I wrote earlier, I suggest we explicitly promote those activities in 
our long description field as nice activities due to them being coded 
flexible enough to support all of the branches that we track in Debian.

Any opinions on that?  Suggestions on actual wording?

  - Jonas

  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20100728/1d2b5f4e/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the Debian-olpc-devel mailing list