[Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#602794: Bug#602794: Bug#602794: sugar-session-0.90 and sugar-tools-0.90: not installable in sid on any architecture

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Mon Nov 8 11:00:43 UTC 2010

On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:29:24AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>Hi Jonas,
>On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:24:54AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 08:56:13AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>>> both sugar-tools-0.90 and sugar-session-0.90 ar not installable in 
>>> sid on any architecture, since
>>>  sugar-session-0.90 (= 0.90.3-1) depends on missing: - python-sugar-0.90
>>>  sugar-tools-0.90 (= 0.90.3-1) depends on missing: - python-sugar-0.90
>>> As a consequence, sucrose-0.90 and sugar-emulator-0.90 are not 
>>> installable as well as these depend on sugar-session-90.
>> This is weird: I agree with above, but wonder how those packages went 
>> missing - I have notes on succesful upload to unstable for them :-/
>maybe it had been kept back because of the freeze?
>Recently I had encountered a similar problem where a package had 
>disappeared from (or not shown up in) unstable (bug #601071). You might 
>want to ask Al what he did to solve it.

Ahh, I see now that it is simply not approved by ftp-masters yet.  I use 
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=dr@jones.dk&comaint=yes and 
simply forgot to also check the "Pending uploads" section.

  - Jonas

  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20101108/d938c9e5/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the Debian-olpc-devel mailing list