[Debian-olpc-devel] Status of sugar packages in Debian

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Hi Luca,

On 12-05-25 at 09:00am, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2011/10/19 Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk>:
> > We briefly discussed this issue recently but I fail to locate it 
> > now.  I seem to recall that we want to maintain 3 branches: 0.84 
> > (well maintained upstream, indicating likely popularity among 
> > deployments), the newest stable-in-Debian branch (0.88?) and newest 
> > upstream stable release (0.94).
> 
> (I'm also CCing FTP Team to keeping us in the loop to accept the 
> packages).
> 
> I just noticed some sugar-0.96 packages in NEW, and before processing 
> them I'd like to discuss about the possibility of dropping some 
> branches. Have you had the chance to discuss this issue?

I have now separately filed a ROM request for sugar-0.86, sugar-0.90 and 
sugar-0.92.

Please approve sugar-0.96 ASAP as we would like to try to get that into 
testing before the freeze, and if that succeeds we will consider 
dropping sugar-0.88 too.

Thanks for your work, it is much appreciated,

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20120525/63980965/attachment.pgp>