[Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#833157: Bug#833157: sugar-base-0.88: don't release with Stretch

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Quoting Simon McVittie (2017-01-29 17:57:26)
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 at 17:42:36 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I agree that sugar-base-0.88 makes sense to drop from Debian.
> 
> Let's make that happen.

Thanks!


> According to `dak rm -R -n` this would involve removal of the 
> following source packages, not all of which were previously mentioned 
> on the bug:
> 
> sugar-base-0.88
> sugar-datastore-0.88
> sugar-toolkit-0.88
> sugar-presence-service-0.88
> sugar-moon-activity
> 
> which variously have a history of NMUs and removals from testing,
> suggesting that they may be eating up more developer time than they
> justify.
> 
> In addition https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/autoremovals.cgi mentions
> sugar-irc-activity; I'm not sure why that doesn't agree with `dak rm -R -n`.

I don't understand dak at all, so appreciate your work here.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20170129/189e29f0/attachment.sig>