On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Sascha Silbe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sascha-ml-ui-sugar-olpc-de@silbe.org">sascha-ml-ui-sugar-olpc-de@silbe.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 07:32:23PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
IMHO, bugs should only be reported upstream if they exist on the latest<br>
release (which is 0.83alphasomething) or in sugar-jhbuild. We don't have the<br>
latest releases packaged.<br>
</blockquote></div>
Which brings us back to the original problem that we don't get sugar(-emulator) from sugar-jhbuild to work, neither on Debian lenny nor on Ubuntu hardy. Bummer.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>That's odd, I was under the impression that -jhbuild was working for Lenny. I know that it works in Intrepid, I'm not sure about Hardy.<br><br>Sugar works very well when all the dependencies are met and the system behaves as it expects (read: Fedora, OLPC XO OS), Debian is of course going to have some sugar bugs.<br>
<br></div></div>-- <br>Luke Faraone<br><a href="http://luke.faraone.cc">http://luke.faraone.cc</a><br>