[Debian-ports-devel] [lfilipoz at debian.org: scheduled downtime for Debian services at UBC (2016-01-09T16:00Z/20:00Z)]
Luca Filipozzi
lfilipoz at debian.org
Sun Jan 10 18:40:21 UTC 2016
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 06:12:04PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 01/10/2016 06:09 PM, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> > This is a conversation to be had with DSA, first. Especially since the switch
> > that traetta is connected to (leda is a VM on traetta) belongs to Debian.
> >
> > I've carbon copied DSA.
>
> Alright. Thank you very much for the heads-up and the help!
I see no evidence on traetta of connectivity issues.
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1c:c4:e5:e8:90
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:93288413 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:252911062 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:35247766269 (32.8 GiB) TX bytes:352512097257 (328.3 GiB)
vnet0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr fe:16:36:40:38:81
inet6 addr: fe80::fc16:36ff:fe40:3881/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:6582656 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:12965971 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
RX bytes:57593850269 (53.6 GiB) TX bytes:7635579949 (7.1 GiB)
br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1c:c4:e5:e8:90
inet addr:206.12.19.21 Bcast:206.12.19.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::21c:c4ff:fee5:e890/64 Scope:Link
inet6 addr: 2607:f8f0:610:4000:21c:c4ff:fee5:e890/64 Scope:Global
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2610993 errors:0 dropped:140 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:787087 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:652838821 (622.5 MiB) TX bytes:1247236858 (1.1 GiB)
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.001cc4e5e890 no eth0
vnet0
I don't have access to leda.debian.net to see its stats.
When are we getting rid of leda.debian.net? traetta.debian.org is an ancient,
power-hungry, CarePack-less machine that I was told was going away years ago.
What happened with the plan to replace leda.debian.net? More to the point, if
it's not our responsibility, why is this VM on DSA-administered hardware?
Thanks,
Luca
--
Luca Filipozzi
http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian
More information about the Debian-ports-devel
mailing list