[Debian-ppc64-devel] is this port alife?

[Andreas Jochens]

On 05-Nov-04 11:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> Sure, but what i reproach you is that you approached them maskerading as *the*
> ppc64 debian porter, while you had no authority to do so, and didn't discuss
> anything with anyone involved.

Again, please stop those accusations. I have no authority and I did not
claim any. I just filed reports to the Debian BTS saying 

"Package 'xyz' fails to build on ppc64 with the error message '...' - 
here is a patch which could fix this."

A lot of things like outdated 'config.sub' files, missing 
'ppc64' in architecture lists, big endian vs. little endian issues, 
missing '#if defined(__powerpc64__)' directives and others got fixed 
this way. If you or anybody else does not like any of these patches,
everybody can state his complains and discuss those patches on the BTS.

Regards
Andreas Jochens