[xml/sgml] question about auto-generated files

[Graham Wilson]

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:37:38PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> Graham Wilson (graham@debian.org) wrote:
> > cvs-inject seems to import them into the repository, however, I thought
> > that it was a bad idea to keep machine generated files under version
> > control. Does anyone else have any experience or thoughts on this?
>=20
> I just did an `cvs rm -f` of all the auto-generated files and followed the
> README.Debian of the autotools-dev package.  Look at the expat package for
> what I did exactly.  IIRC I also did that with the libxslt package when I
> maintained it.

Did you do this after the upstream source was in CVS? Was this in the
debian branch, or in the vendor branch? If the vendor branch, how does
cvs-update handle the situation where the new upstream source package
has files not in CVS?

--=20
gram

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/public.asc

iQEVAwUBP7pQyi6fnYH5E4SWAQJf6Qf+IGzBBSjlD9RC2fUuSbTWSIfVp6RZ9b+D
CsvBqBKxtQz5jrBgULBsX43SKqDRloUohTLXzfk+8fvbh+pB0Aj3U3r9A6nmTONm
gpaiA+x4ecToxJrJcXyqKsUV0mcZRUn92HTwNamwLnmgfKr3QMskPYerEa94kvWF
YPq2JSYWWmhfP9XSgyzb4NP4OTw/5c6TwnXRHgyg/rYe+cFhMqUpfGypTCnfkWZh
IB9ec7sMp0hrqc5wv7wRo0ukGli1BgIir/23Y14YTUhaTLd909k+ZDcp9D16vbY6
7gN/VTrzpQuIkNhQZWW2LE9M3QKyBqAszUbX9E0E3cpokulqbP63JA==
=Pypk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--