[debpool] Re: Subversion repository up

Free Ekanayaka freee at debian.org
Tue Apr 10 14:52:49 UTC 2007


|--==> Magnus Holmgren writes:

  MH> On Tuesday 10 April 2007 15:19, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
  >>Weird, I did it right in my patch to http://bugs.debian.org/350503, but
  >>then I for some reason told myself that Tree_Mkdir() created directories
  >>recursively, which it doesn't. The question is: should it, or should I call
  >>it twice in Install_Package()?

  MH> I think it should, for the purpose of allowing more flexibility in the pool 
  MH> structure. pool/section/p/package is the standard, but no requirement. If you 
  MH> merely have a couple of dozen source packages then pool/section/package will 
  MH> suffice, and not everyone needs or cares about subdividing the pool by 
  MH> section (e.g. if you aren't selling CDs or if you only have "main").

Oh yeas, that makes sense to me.

  MH> I can't see any reason that DebPool::Dirs::PoolDir() shouldn't include the 
  MH> final component (nominally the package name) in the return value. Can you? 
  MH> All invocations have the package name joined to the end of the return value, 
  MH> like so:

  MH>   join('/', PoolDir($pkg_name, $section), $pkg_name)

That's fine for me.

Ciao,

Free



More information about the Debpool-devel mailing list