[debpool] Re: Subversion repository up
Free Ekanayaka
freee at debian.org
Tue Apr 10 14:52:49 UTC 2007
|--==> Magnus Holmgren writes:
MH> On Tuesday 10 April 2007 15:19, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>>Weird, I did it right in my patch to http://bugs.debian.org/350503, but
>>then I for some reason told myself that Tree_Mkdir() created directories
>>recursively, which it doesn't. The question is: should it, or should I call
>>it twice in Install_Package()?
MH> I think it should, for the purpose of allowing more flexibility in the pool
MH> structure. pool/section/p/package is the standard, but no requirement. If you
MH> merely have a couple of dozen source packages then pool/section/package will
MH> suffice, and not everyone needs or cares about subdividing the pool by
MH> section (e.g. if you aren't selling CDs or if you only have "main").
Oh yeas, that makes sense to me.
MH> I can't see any reason that DebPool::Dirs::PoolDir() shouldn't include the
MH> final component (nominally the package name) in the return value. Can you?
MH> All invocations have the package name joined to the end of the return value,
MH> like so:
MH> join('/', PoolDir($pkg_name, $section), $pkg_name)
That's fine for me.
Ciao,
Free
More information about the Debpool-devel
mailing list