[debpool] Possible use of git for debpool?

[Magnus Holmgren]

On torsdagen den 3 januari 2008, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 9:05 AM, Magnus Holmgren <holmgren at lysator.liu.se> wrote:
> > On onsdagen den 2 januari 2008, Andres Mejia wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if debpool would benefit more with being hosted using
> > > git instead of SVN. One of the things I here about using git is the
> > > ease of merging between branches that it provides. Any thoughts?
> >
> > That's probably true, but I'd like to try Mercurial someday too. It's
> > also quite popular, as I understand it.
>
> Ok, we could use an hg repository for debpool, but I don't think it
> will be a good idea, at least if we want to attract more support for
> debpool. Right now it seems that it's only you and me that have an
> interest in debpool. Here's my thoughts.

Since I've come to use and know git at my workplace, I am now fine with 
switching to it.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren at lysator.liu.se
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)

  "Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for 
   Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debpool-devel/attachments/20080215/8b43c59c/attachment.pgp