[Debtags-devel] Autodebtag and Debram
Enrico Zini
enrico@enricozini.org
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:30:15 +0200
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:28:41PM +0000, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> > pushed by ideas spawned from yesterday's discussion, I worked a bit on
> > autodebtag and the debram database.
> Is the sid debtags-data (0.5.1) used, or is the SVN debram-body.txt
> used?
The sid that I have installed in /usr/share/debram/
> No particular reason underlies the question; the question seeks
> information only. (Today, the sid data ramifies only woody, while the
> SVN debram-body.txt ramifies sarge plus some old woody packages no
> longer in sarge. For your purpose, each choice has advantages. As to
> the SVN data, the old woody packages will disappear from current SVN at
> next commit.)
Well, yes, no problem: the script is able to cope with packages that
disappeared, and it's still a test anyway. Maybe later it would be
interesting to use the sarge one.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <enrico@debian.org>
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBdAu39LSwzHl+v6sRAqIRAJ4nsZXch+peA+XG1bEsCIyaI2W3hwCeL3hb
E1r6jPMna9irGxs+O5D8qd4=
=mp6w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--