[Debtags-devel] Autodebtag and Debram

Enrico Zini enrico@enricozini.org
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:30:15 +0200


--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:28:41PM +0000, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:

> > pushed by ideas spawned from yesterday's discussion, I worked a bit on
> > autodebtag and the debram database.
> Is the sid debtags-data (0.5.1) used, or is the SVN debram-body.txt
> used?

The sid that I have installed in /usr/share/debram/

> No particular reason underlies the question; the question seeks
> information only.  (Today, the sid data ramifies only woody, while the
> SVN debram-body.txt ramifies sarge plus some old woody packages no
> longer in sarge.  For your purpose, each choice has advantages.  As to
> the SVN data, the old woody packages will disappear from current SVN at
> next commit.)

Well, yes, no problem: the script is able to cope with packages that
disappeared, and it's still a test anyway.  Maybe later it would be
interesting to use the sarge one.


Ciao,

Enrico

--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <enrico@debian.org>

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBdAu39LSwzHl+v6sRAqIRAJ4nsZXch+peA+XG1bEsCIyaI2W3hwCeL3hb
E1r6jPMna9irGxs+O5D8qd4=
=mp6w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--