[Debtags-devel] roles
Justin B Rye
jbr@edlug.org.uk
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:42:50 +0100
Enrico Zini wrote:
[...]
(Cutting most of it because I'd rather get on with implementing the
current scheme than get hung up on particular suggested changes...)
>> media/format:
>> * End-users searching for audio-handling packages will find xmms but
>> not xmms-doc or xblast-tnt-sounds.
>
> Here I wouldn't mind if people that go for media::audio found
> xblast-tnt-sounds
I'd mind, because it isn't what they asked for, is it? Yes,
xblast-tnt-sounds contains audio-format data, but it isn't something
that handles any sort of data at all. Confusing the functions of
media:: (ie "handler-for::") and format:: (ie "contains::") makes
both of them less useful as entry-points.
> However, the "media" facet wouldn't be the only point of entry for audio
> applications. One could very well start from "sound::player" or
> "use::playing", both of which wouldn't lead to xblast-tnt-sounds.
I don't see how that would justify tagging xblast-tnt-sounds under
media:: as a package that handles audio data.
There's a danger that if there are a dozen different plausible entry
points for a given query, each of which presents a different
unpredictable risk of getting bogged down in unreliable categories,
that's going to make debtags harder to use rather than easier.
--
JBR
Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing)