[Debtags-devel] sarge is stable but debtags are not...
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:00:23 +0200
I'm currently getting more and more into debtags (as I want to use debtags =
cdd-dev and local admin tasks) and just noticed that you're restructuring t=
tags and facets (media:: to speciality::, redefining role::), which is very=
sensible in itself but causes problems when you want to use debtags for=20
production use (where "random" changes are not acceptable).
Obviously it's easily possible to just copy the debtags repository to a=20
local/stable repository and just use that - but IMO this is just a=20
What do you think ? IMO for sarge this is ok, but for etch (where debtags=20
hopefully will be used a lot more) we should aim for a better=20
approach/solution, i.e. a stable, a testing and a unstable repository ;-)
Maybe I should submit this as a bug to the debtags package ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----