[Debtags-devel] What about the lonely tags?

Torsten Marek shlomme at gmx.net
Fri Nov 18 22:30:14 UTC 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Enrico Zini schrieb:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 05:42:50PM +0100, Torsten Marek wrote:
> 
> 
>>what is happening with the lonely tags (= tags without facets)?
>>I just had a look at the new package browser and the tagging interface, and they
>>were taking up some space.
>>Currently, these are (grep "Tag: [0-9a-z\-]*$" debian-packages)
>>Tag: educational
> 
> ...
> 
>>Tag: vi
>>As it seems, no packages use these tags. Can they be removed?
> 
> 
> Almost.  Here's what is happening:
> 
>  - Those tags are still available in Erich's packagebrowser: you can see
>    them in the tag database at
>    http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/tags-current.gz
>  - Since the various debtags code assumes tags to have a facet, during
>    "debtags update" those tags are automatically assigned the facet
>    "legacy".  This is why you don't see any package using those tags.
> 
> What would need to be done would be to rename those tags into their
> faceted counterparts.  Unfortunately, this is not always easy to do:
> 
>  - some of them are too broad: "netcomm, protocols"
>  - some of them don't have a place in the vocabulary, like "office"
>    (for office, the idea is that "office" is more like a marketing thing
>    and categories should be more meaningful, such as editing, drawing
>    and so on)
> 
> So, what would need to be done would be to check the packages that have
> those tags, and try to replace those tags with one of the other faceted
> ones, or to remove them when all the information they convey is already
> expressed by the other faceted tags.  For example, one could remove
> 'protocols' when a package already has one of the 'protocol::*' tags.
> 
Hi,

I've just started looking at those, and there are a lot of packages that have
facets as tag, for instance:
3dchess: x11::application, use::gameplaying, game::board:chess, *special*,
interface::3d, *works-with*

What is to happen with that?

greetings

Torsten

- --
Torsten Marek <shlomme at gmx.net>
ID: A244C858 -- FP: 1902 0002 5DFC 856B F146  894C 7CC5 451E A244 C858
Keyserver: subkeys.pgp.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDflX2fMVFHqJEyFgRAuoVAJ9rEg+r/FkuoiVxfe1b6wEBAcihWwCePCG0
rtcjsUghgNc5cQzvTx5/bIo=
=ZFvL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Debtags-devel mailing list