arch specific tags

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

On Tuesday 28 November 2006 09:10, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Recasting the question, would there be enough drift wrt the Architecture
> field in the source package to be worth the upkeep? ATM I can't think at
> any case where the tag would be different to the concept of "there is a
> binary package on a given arch".

Documentation comes to my mind, but thats probably all. There might be a few  
arch-all packages which are only useful on selected archs, but not many.

> If the drift it's not enough I would rather prefer to start thinking at
> an infrastructure in which external---or more generally,
> derived---information can be used as tags.

or for automatic tagging :) 


regards,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/attachments/20061128/95e4cc60/attachment.pgp