Todo tagging and new tag proposals
Guillem Jover
guillem at debian.org
Sun Aug 5 01:57:04 UTC 2007
Hi,
I went through all my packages some weeks ago and tried to tag all
the remaining ones. But there seems to be some missing tags and some
weird suggestions, or some missundrstanding from my part (maybe
due to lack of clarity regarding some tags?). I'd appreciate some help
so I can eventually be debtags clean!
On my todo page
<http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/todo.html?maint=guillem%40debian.org>
there's:
inetutils-ftp, inetutils-telnet, inetutils-telnetd
The page suggests
«There is a 91.5% chance that a x11::* tag is missing»
although all those programs are terminal based. Maybe some of the
current tags are wrong and are triggering this.
gnumach-dbg - use::TODO
What about a new use::debugging? Even though I assigned
devel::debugger due to the in-kernel debugger, and not due to
the additional debugging symbols.
gnumach-dev - devel::TODO
This package contains only header files and interface definitions
for the gnumach kernel, and the page is suggesting to add
devel::libraru which does not seem appropriate. Probably the problem
stems from role::devel-lib which is not enterely accurate. So either
a new devel::headers or refining role::devel-lib?
libaio-dev, libaio1, libglide2, libglide2-dev, libglide3,
libglide3-dev, openhackware - implemented-in::TODO
Those would need something like implemented-in::assembler or
implemented-in::asm.
libufs2 - works-with::TODO
This would need something like works-with::filesystem.
thanks,
guillem
More information about the Debtags-devel
mailing list