Todo tagging and new tag proposals

Guillem Jover guillem at debian.org
Sun Aug 5 01:57:04 UTC 2007


Hi,

I went through all my packages some weeks ago and tried to tag all
the remaining ones. But there seems to be some missing tags and some
weird suggestions, or some missundrstanding from my part (maybe
due to lack of clarity regarding some tags?). I'd appreciate some help
so I can eventually be debtags clean!

On my todo page

<http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/todo.html?maint=guillem%40debian.org>

there's:

inetutils-ftp, inetutils-telnet, inetutils-telnetd

  The page suggests

    «There is a 91.5% chance that a x11::* tag is missing»

  although all those programs are terminal based. Maybe some of the
  current tags are wrong and are triggering this.

gnumach-dbg - use::TODO

  What about a new use::debugging? Even though I assigned
  devel::debugger due to the in-kernel debugger, and not due to
  the additional debugging symbols.

gnumach-dev - devel::TODO

  This package contains only header files and interface definitions
  for the gnumach kernel, and the page is suggesting to add
  devel::libraru which does not seem appropriate. Probably the problem
  stems from role::devel-lib which is not enterely accurate. So either
  a new devel::headers or refining role::devel-lib?

libaio-dev, libaio1, libglide2, libglide2-dev, libglide3,
libglide3-dev, openhackware - implemented-in::TODO

  Those would need something like implemented-in::assembler or
  implemented-in::asm.

libufs2 - works-with::TODO

  This would need something like works-with::filesystem.

thanks,
guillem



More information about the Debtags-devel mailing list