enrico at enricozini.org
Mon Jan 2 12:16:05 UTC 2012
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:45:08PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> Just to be clear, I don't think you got the very last version of the
> tags. Some tags are back, some aren't. I'm currently fixing them
Thanks. There could well be some spurious ones, caused by the autotagger
adding tags during the time it thought it wasn't yet tagged.
> By the way, I see new strange messages on some of my packages, such as:
> "implemented-in::* tags are rarely (0.994%) used in this way"
> I can't make sense of this particular one for instance, which applies
> to tagainijisho (tagged as "implemented-in::c++")
Those are statistically generated suggestions that are to be taken with
a grain of salt.
I guess that in this case it's seeing "made-of::*" tags, that make it
think that it could be a data package, for which "implemented-in::*"
tags generally don't apply.
I have it in my todo list to provide some explanation for the tips: how
are they generated, what kind of guess they are making, and how
seriously they should be taken.
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico at enricozini.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Debtags-devel