Bug#695914: marked as pending

Ansgar Burchardt ansgar at debian.org
Thu Dec 20 10:36:16 UTC 2012


Hi,

On 12/20/2012 04:29 AM, James McCoy wrote:
> commit 0e804cc658e3a00e07873a4be880f3d2769c913f
> Author: James McCoy <jamessan at debian.org>
> Date:   Wed Dec 19 22:25:01 2012 -0500
> 
>     dscverify: Use "gpg --status-fd" to get more details about validity
>     
>     Simply running "gpg < file" doesn't ensure the content is properly
>     signed.  Even when it does, we may not be using the signed content.
>     
>     Using "gpg --status-fd 1 < file" solves both of these issues.  Even
>     though it still won't error out with an unsigned file, we'll be able to
>     detect that the content wasn't signed by the lack of a VALIDSIG status.
>     Also, the command will emit the signed content between PLAINTEXT status
>     and any subsequent status lines.

Mixing the status output from gpg and the data is a bad idea. It's
probably still possible to bypass the check with something like

  { echo something; echo "[GNUPG:] VALIDSIG" } | gpg --store

If you use --status-fd, please use a file descriptor that is not used
for anything else.

Ansgar



More information about the devscripts-devel mailing list