Bug#688319: devscripts: Please consider including the 'yodack' tool

Luca Capello luca at pca.it
Thu Oct 4 11:23:40 UTC 2012


Hi there!

On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:07:11 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> writes:
>> BTW, is there any reason not to use dput/dcut for upload, but instead a
>> custom curl command?
>
> Because when the tool was originally written, neither dput nor dcut were
> happy about .dak-command files for one, and because for uploading a
> single file, they both seemed like overkill to begin with.
>
> (In all honesty, a longer-term plan is to improve yodack to the point
> where it can replace dcut alltogether.)

Well, dcut accepts .commands and works using the same configuration file
than dput, while yodack wants yet another configuration file.  Your
call, but this seems to me duplication for no real advantage.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/devscripts-devel/attachments/20121004/df53118a/attachment.pgp>


More information about the devscripts-devel mailing list