Bug#688843: licensecheck: detect BDS-3-clause as BSD-2-clause
Adam D. Barratt
adam at adam-barratt.org.uk
Wed Sep 26 07:44:33 UTC 2012
On 26.09.2012 08:12, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> licensecheck incorrectly detect the license of the
> attached file as BSD (2 clause) when it is really
> BSD (3 clause), see
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses#3-clause_license_.28.22New_BSD_License.22_or_.22Modified_BSD_License.22.29
It looks very much /not/ BSD-3, so far as I can see.
The standard third clause, as per the link you quoted above is of the
form:
* Neither the name of the <organization> nor the
names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote
products
derived from this software without specific prior written
permission.
whereas the file you attached says
* The name of the contributors may be used to endorse or promote
products
derived from this software without specific prior written
permission.
That's different enough to make it a different license, imo. Obviously
my co-maintainers may disagree.
Regards,
Adam
More information about the devscripts-devel
mailing list